October 30, 2003

OPINION://Voicemail: don't phone home

Circuit-switched thinking runs deep. Because the only thing the PSTN can do is make a phone call, every problem is solved by making a phone call.

Take voicemail, for instance. Whilst trying not to bore you with the obvious, let’s recap how traditional voicemail works. The phone network intercepts unanswered calls using a time-out, and re-directs them to a voicemail server. The caller talks to the voicemail server, and that server stores the message. The callee receives a message waiting indicator, and later on makes a phone call to the voicemail system. Everything’s a phone call.

We’re all so used to this paradigm, we never question whether any other mechanism is possible, or whether the current approach makes sense. We seem to assume that future technologies like multi-modal phones and CDMA EV-DV (simulaneous circuit voice and packet data) are needed before we will break out of this mess. That isn’t necessarily so.

Assume a phone call requires an (extremely generous) 3Kb per second of audio. One hour of stored audio is about 10Mb of data. This is a pretty modest amount by the standards of modern flash memeory. Your mobile phone is perfectly capable of storing all your voicemail. The network is perfectly capable of transmitting the data in a sensible amount of time. Unlike email, most voicemail is listened to - the amount of wasted download is small.

Of course, the handset cannot be the voicemail server itself, because it may be out of signal range or turned off. Store-and-forward is still necessary.

You should be able to listen to voicemails on your plane journey home. You should be able to reply to them on a store-and-forward basis, even when you’re not connected to the network. And most of all, you shouldn’t have to use a clunky telephony user interface to navigate a message queue. And you shouldn’t be restricted to one device for accessing your own data.

How often have you returned a call in voicemail, spoken to the caller, and then finished the call by closing your phone or pressing ‘end’? You find yourself dumped out of the voicemail system (hey, you ended the call to the voicemail server - the phone couldn’t tell the difference!). To go back and delete the message, you have to re-dial and navigate the whole voicemail user interface again. Yet there’s a prefectly adequate 2 inch screen that could have been used to list the entries, just like an email inbox.

Or have you ever had the experience of someone calling you from their cell phone, leaving you a voicemail, but you can’t quite pick out the critical number they dictated because their connection dropped out for a moment? But if their message had been recorded locally, and forwarded over a TCP connection, it would have been crystal clear.

Taking this further, why on earth is it the recipient’s carrier that decides when and where to redirect me? Why can’t my handset just look up in a directory where you want voice messages sent?

The technology to make the end points smart is here today. We might not be able to do reliable wireless VoIP on wide-area networks with the deployed technology of today. There is a usability gap still to be filled, and profit to be made from filling it.

The abandonment of the circuit-switched world for all communication that isn’t both real-time and two-way is seriously overdue.

Posted by Martin Geddes at 03:56 PM
Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.telepocalypse.net/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/mgeddes/MT/mt-tb.cgi/37.

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Voicemail: don't phone home:

» Beyond circuit-switched thinking from Werblog
Telepocalypse : "The abandonment of the circuit-switched world for all communication that isn't both real-time and two-way is seriously overdue." [Read more]

Tracked on October 31, 2003 02:40 PM

» Post-circuit-switched voicemail from Audioblog/Mobileblogging News
[Read more]

Tracked on November 1, 2003 02:50 PM

» The Future of Voicemail from The Importance of...
Telepocalypse speculates about what voicemail might look like in a non-PSTN world (Voicemail: don't phone home). For example: You should be able to listen to voicemails on your plane journey home. You should be able to reply to them on... [Read more]

Tracked on May 6, 2004 01:18 PM
Comments

Actually, cellphones use at least 13 Kbps for voice signals, and that's with extremely efficient vocoders to compress speech into audio "primitives." (and results in audio quality considerably lower than hard-line telephony).

Your general point still stands of course. This is just a nit.

Posted by: at November 1, 2003 01:06 PM

On the Sanyo SCP-6200 it has a "screen call" option which allows messages to be recorded directly to the phone. It's not as usefull as what you have described considering I have to be around my phone to use it but it's a step in the right direction.

Posted by: at November 1, 2003 03:16 PM

While listening to voicemail on the plane, I could use the screen on the phone to navigate. But given the trend to smaller and smaller phones, why not just plug the phone into the USB port on your laptop?

We can then switch to a really nice screen workup, with a ton of details that are normally hard to find. And if you have an integrated messaging client, then the voicemails appear in your inbox - sorted by timestamp with the rest of your messages, to help avoid confusion.

Of course, this would mean that losing the phone loses the voicemail, too. Can we take a belt and suspenders approach, and temporarily archive anything sent to the phone's inbox?

Posted by: at November 2, 2003 01:33 AM

If voicemail just went to my email inbox, and my phone was an IMAP client like my notebook, then I can navigate and delete messages from either interface. Any changes to IMAP folders while offline (deleted messages, text replies, etc.) will be syncronized to the IMAP server when connectivity is restored.

The notebook is not so good at calling people back, and the phone is not so good at displaying PDF attachments, but that's why we carry both of them.

Posted by: at December 10, 2003 02:51 PM

Wow, I was really happy to find this thread (eventually). Often I have complained about my cordless handset making me go to the base to retrieve voice-mail messages, but the concept of storing voice-mail in a cellphone handset makes even more sense.
While many systems don't have capability to send a voice mail to a handset and the handsets themselves don't have the capability to unwind MP3 audio, for example, wouldn't it make sense to use the SMS (or similar) channel to send the file to the handset during off-peak or times when channnel utilization were low?
I really like the idea of reviewing voice-mail messages on the plane. With a WAV output you could even post replies for sending later when off the plane.
Someone told me Nextel offers voice mail to the handset, either as a URL to a streaming server or the actual file.
Maybe someone should write an MP3 player for handsets to play audio files sent over SMS.

Posted by: at October 8, 2004 05:30 PM
Please enter your comment below. Your comment will not appear immediately -- they all go for pre-approval by me because of the volume of spam I receive.







Remember personal info?