To those familiar with Goldratt’s Theory of Constraints, Cingular’s win over Vodafone will come as no surprise. As Om Malik reminds us, Cingular was constrained from growth by spectrum availability. With rising network usage, its ability to service even its existing customers was coming under strain. A key stage in TOC is elevation of the constraint. Since Cingular are (excuse the pun) technologically constrained in their ability to make more efficient use of spectrum and exploit the constraint, acquision was the only way forward — at whatever price it took. Which, presumably, Vodafone knew as well, and exacted the full price.
The irony is that Vodafone may not come out of this so well after all. Rationalization will help prop up prices (although competition remains fierce, with many regional players in bigger markets). Spectrum shortage will discourage entrants. And the high price Cingular paid will discourage them from competing on price, because they need the cash flow. This raises returns across the industry. Stock values of all the wireless carriers are rising fast. Verizon becomes even more expensive to buy out, others are less attractive to buy up.
Perhaps Vodafone should have been bold a year ago when the market was still weak, rather than waiting for events to overtake them? Easy to throw stones from the blogside, but if you’re a CEO being paid an eight-figure salary, the expectation is your foresight exceeds my hindsight.
Posted by Martin Geddes at 11:06 PMTrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.telepocalypse.net/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/mgeddes/MT/mt-tb.cgi/157.
Perhaps Vodafone should have been bold a year ago when the market was still weak, rather than waiting for events to overtake them? Easy to throw stones from the blogside, but if you’re a CEO being paid an eight-figure salary, the expectation is your foresight exceeds my hindsight.
--------------------
Unbelievable! Amazing!!!
Apparently you don't have the slightest clue that your 'hindsight' is complete rubbish.
Its not only impractical, its unethical, and even illegal.
RE:constraits
Here also, you're way offbase again.
The controlling contraints were/are not technical, they're business/market and contractual constraints.
The notion that VOD has the ability to 'make the first' move is invalid, and that is still the case.
In hindsight I'd say both VZ and VOD did very well. They force SBC/BLS to pay $47B for a distressed carrier. If you factor in some AWE sub lose, Cingular paid ~$2300/sub. Very rich, considering that many public carriers have traded as low as $1200.
Posted by: at February 19, 2004 07:35 AM