December 08, 2004

Social outcasts

Via Stuart Henshall comes news of StumbleUpon. This is a bookmark-cum-clippings social network service. So unlike, say, blogdex or del.icio.us, it’s as much about who the bookmarks come from as what they are.

My farewell patent frenzy at Sprint led to a filing along these lines. I won’t disclose the details — you’ll have to wait for it to get published via the usual channels. But I’ll give you some clues. There’s a hidden power in the dark heart of the smart network traditional telco. A central aggregation point of all traffic — voice, email, IM, or SMS — gives one entity a complete view of who talks to whom, for how long, who ends the conversation, who returns whose calls, and so on. In other words, there’s a latent social network in there.

If you call me and we speak for an hour, that tells you something about or relationship. If a telemarketer makes thousands of calls and they typically last 10 seconds, and are terminated by the callee, that tells you something too.

Assume opt-in from users to overcome privacy concerns. What the telco is sitting on is potentially the biggest social networking goldmine east of the Yukon. As I’ve said before, the core asset of a telco is the data it acquires, not the network. Networks are loss leaders to create foot traffic and encourage people to engage in transactions.

Another consequence of StumbleUpon and its ilk is that social networking works best when it is achieved via recovery of the social pattern from an unrelated adjacent system. If I decide to take you off my buddy list, you might get offended. If I don’t call you and the relationship fades away, nobody cares. These proxy social network systems are also very hard to game. Bill Gates isn’t going to spend an hour on the phone to me no matter how many will-you-be-my-pal invites I send to his secretary.

For pure stupid network services, this type of latent social network analysis is tougher. The more decentralised the application’s control mechanisms (e.g. users have a choice of browsers, or IM clients) the bigger the coordination problem in obtaining and aggregating the data in a central point.

Now, any ideas of how a low-profit VoIP service provider like Skype might turn a few cents from their virtual network…? I do!

Posted by Martin Geddes at 11:06 AM
Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.telepocalypse.net/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/mgeddes/MT/mt-tb.cgi/357.

Comments

Martin, you may like to check out www.furl.net as well. Am using both of these concurrently for now. You may also want to use the Skype API to create some of those services and remain controllable by the user. Cheers Stuart

Posted by: at December 16, 2004 08:05 PM

Do you of any vendors who provide social networking software for telcos .

Paul Bloom
IBM

Posted by: at August 21, 2006 02:56 PM

No, I don't -- despite the call and messaging traffic being a veritable gold mine of information once the user opts in to it being mined for their advantage (e.g. smart call routing).

Posted by: at August 31, 2006 05:26 PM
Please enter your comment below. Your comment will not appear immediately -- they all go for pre-approval by me because of the volume of spam I receive.







Remember personal info?