Welcome to my old blog, which I no longer maintain.

For details of my current professional services and activities see www.martingeddes.com.

February 8, 2005

Wiretrapped

Hang on a minute. Your ISP may want to charge you extra for hosting a server, or may want to deploy bandwidth shaping to throttle your P2P traffic. But who gave them permission to look beyond the IP headers?

Those TCP and UDP headers aren't needed to route the packet. Why isn't this an illegal wiretap? How on earth are Cisco et al getting away with selling deep packet inspection tools for public networks? Are terms of service that give your provider a blanket wiretap authority enforceable? How come?

Reader advice sought: is this actually legal in your jurisdiction? If so, how come? If not, why isn't the wiretap law enforced? How come people aren't up in arms about the privacy invasion?

(Note that intermediation services like Akamai's web caching are OK; although they "intercept" your packets, the packets have in fact reached their final destination. It just turns out that the IP address of, say, the Yahoo home page is a logical address, not a physical one. It's not a wiretap if the recipient authorises it.)

Posted by Martin Geddes at 9:47 AM
Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.telepocalypse.net/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/mgeddes/MT/mt-tb.cgi/396

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Wiretrapped:

» Another Geddes mindbomb - Do ISPs have the legal right to inspect your packets and throttle your traffic as a result? from Peer 1 Blog

2nd mindbomb of the day for me from Martin. Hmmm.

From Telepocalypse by Martin Geddes: Wiretrapped.:

QUOTE

Hang on ...
[Read more]

Tracked on February 12, 2005 12:26 AM