It’s been a whole lot of midnight oil, but I’m ready to announce something new and good: The Telco 2.0 initiative.
I’m working with my colleagues at STL Partners, who presently publish IMS Insider newsletter and IMS Insider blog (a.k.a IMS Skeptics’ Weekly). We are creating a new consulting business, primarily aimed at network operators and suppliers hitting the telecom menopause and needing some business model hormone therapy. Together, we’ve got a depth of insight, experience and passion for the area I don’t think anyone else can match. My personal goal/mantra: Deliver the sector-specific advice that McKinsey can’t give you.
As you might expect, we’ve got a blog, inventively named Telco 2.0. It’s a group blog, written Economist style without individual attribution. If I ever get time, I’ll tell the story of how hard it is to put together a commercial blog using off-the-shelf tools, and integrate email marketing, change management, branding, security, privacy policy, operational information, feedback management, contact management, etc. In a word: horrendous. None of the out-of-the-box solutions came close to meeting my requirements, so I integrated it myself. Heaven help anyone with a business bent who doesn’t have a technical background but wishes to go beyond basic “message & link” blogging. There are still some rough edges, please be patient as we work through them.
We’ve also launched a Manifesto for Telco 2.0. We believe that there is a need to succinctly describe the issues and solutions in a format that is accessible to an operator and vendor audience. Most people don’t read blogs (sadly — their loss) and need a simple link that can be mailed around between people and isn’t tied up with the blog mechanics. I really must slap on that Creative Commons license some time… another to-do.
I look forward to getting your feedback — one of the many to-do items is to make comments and updates for the manifesto easier and add trackbacks/search engine backlinks.
Naturally, we’re aiming to make a living, so there’s an overtly revenue-based bit. We’ve got a reassuringly expensive report based on oodles of research and insight. And a Telco 2.0 Industry Brainstorm event in October. Not quite a traditional conference, too structured to be an unconference. Target audience is senior execs concerned their business model has a “best before” date printed in fuzzy letters on the underside.
Why “Telco 2.0”? Is this stepping on a tired Bandwagon 2.0? I think not, and here’s why:
I could probably go on finding more and weaker analogies, but I think you get the idea. The “2.0” buzzwords like social media are equally applicable to telcos with their massive installed telephony base (like it or not) and forays into the world’s favourite narcotic, television.
So, what about this baby, Telepocalypse? Four kids: two girls, two blogs. I think I deserve a bigger family tax break. Telepocalypse most definitely carries on: much of what I want to write about is too speculative, controversial, personal or off-topic for Telco 2.0. Plus I like the clean separation of my personal passions from my commercial ones. Telepocalypse isn’t here to sell you anything. Telco 2.0, most pleasingly, is.
I think you can fit another subscription into your news reader, don’t you?
Posted by Martin Geddes at 03:32 PMTrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.telepocalypse.net/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/mgeddes/MT/mt-tb.cgi/743.
Hi Martin,
Congragulations on the new venture. Would be tuned into this blog too.
Let me know if I can help in any way.
Cheers,
Rajan
I'm sure PHPnuke could have been used to fulfill all your tech needs.
Posted by: at June 16, 2006 12:24 AMFantastic, another perspective on the ideas around structural separation, dumb networks and the layered model.
Particularly appreciated the observation:
``We believe that trying to be “all things to all men” in any market is a recipe for disaster: the separating layers of the business model will tear your business apart.''
Indeed, and I think the idea that vertical integration across layers is a recipe for disaster is best illustrated by this slide from Doc Searl's "Infrastructure: How Geeks Build It, Why Hollywood Doesn't Understand It, and How Business Can Take Advantage of It:"
http://conferences.oreillynet.com/presentations/os2002/doc/source/slide29.html
As you can see, the shearing forces on a vertically stove-piped organisation that tries to do infrastructure, commerce & fashion ("ring-tones" etc.) will indeed tear it apart due to the varying rates of change in each layer.
It really was over for the telcos the day they packetised voice, that introduced the separation between voltage and wire that once meant they operated in a single flat layer.
We've had a demonstration for the decades since of how long a successful past incumbent can hold back a less rewarding, to them, future.
Can they change? Old dogs, leopards and spots? Hopefully your services will help.
Hamish.
PS. Spotted one minor typo: "Clearerly focus on the right part of the value chain." "Did you mean: Clearly"
Posted by: at June 16, 2006 10:29 PMMartin, best of luck and I've added your new creation to my bloglines aggregator, pushing your sub count to double digits (triple digits to arrive shortly). I'm trying to figure a way to be in London Oct 4,5, and let me know how I can help you succeed. See you in early Sept?
BTW I would have pursued Wordpress plus some php heavy lifting where required.
Posted by: at June 18, 2006 01:15 AM